RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Open reduction and internal fixation represent prevalent orthopedic procedures, sparking ongoing discourse over whether to retain or remove asymptomatic implants. Achieving consensus on this matter is paramount for orthopedic surgeons. This study aims to quantify the impact of routine implant removal on patients and healthcare facilities. A retrospective analysis of implant removal cases from 2016 to 2022 at King Fahad Hospital of the University (KFHU) was conducted and subjected to statistical scrutiny. Among these cases, 44% necessitated hospitalization exceeding one day, while 56% required only a single day. Adults exhibited a 55% need for extended hospital stays, contrasting with 22.8% among the pediatric cohort. The complication rate was 6%, with all patients experiencing at least one complication. Notably, 34.1% required sick leave and 4.8% exceeded 14 d. General anesthesia was predominant (88%). Routine implant removal introduces unwarranted complications, particularly in adults, potentially prolonging hospitalization. This procedure strains hospital resources, tying up the operating room that could otherwise accommodate critical surgeries. Clearly defined institutional guidelines are imperative to regulate this practice. AIM: To measure the burden of routine implant removal on the patients and hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis study of 167 routine implant removal cases treated at KFHU, a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. Data were collected in the orthopedic department at KFHU from February 2016 to August 2022, which includes routine asymptomatic implant removal cases across all age categories. Nonroutine indications such as infection, pain, implant failure, malunion, nonunion, restricted range of motion, and prominent hardware were excluded. Patients who had external fixators removed or joints replaced were also excluded. RESULTS: Between February 2016 and August 2022, 360 implants were retrieved; however, only 167 of those who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. The remaining implants were rejected due to exclusion criteria. Among the cases, 44% required more than one day in the hospital, whereas 56% required only one day. 55% of adults required more than one day of hospitalization, while 22.8% of pediatric patients required more than one day of inpatient care. The complication rate was 6%, with each patient experiencing at least one complication. Sick leave was required in 34.1% of cases, with 4.8% requiring more than 14 d. The most common type of anesthesia used in the surgeries was general anesthesia (88%), and the mean (SD) surgery duration was 77.1 (54.7) min. CONCLUSION: Routine implant removal causes unnecessary complications, prolongs hospital stays, depletes resources and monopolizing operating rooms that could serve more critical procedures.
RESUMO
Background: The Distal radius fractures in the pediatric age group have similar complications to any other fracture. One interpretation of the high fracture incidence in the distal third of the radius is the relative weakness of the metaphyseal part. Objective: The aim of this study is to provide an evaluation of Surgical complications of distal radius through satisfactory reduction and proper fixation by K-wires through bone growth plates. Methods: A retrospective single-center study in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Saudi Arabia from 2000 to 2021, using the hospital's electronic records system. The Inclusion criteria of this study involve all distal radius fracture cases who underwent surgical fixation by k-wire or plating system and are up to 14 years old. The exclusion criteria include loss of follow-up, incomplete data, and age of more than 14 years. Results: the study included 103 patients. The side of injury was almost equally distributed between the left and right sides. The odds of having at least one complication increase by 2.5 folds if the site of fracture is at the diaphysis. Further, if the distance of the fracture line to the epiphysis is more than 20 mm, the odds of reporting at least one complication post-procedure is 4.4 times higher than if it was at the level of the epiphysis. The majority of diaphyseal fractures required less than 6 weeks for radiological healing, which is significantly different from other sites which were evaluated. Conclusion: Complications of distal radius fracture due to Surgical intervention could be confounded by the complexity of the fracture itself. In our study, we found the distance of the fracture from the physis was inversely proportional to the likelihood of complications. For a comprehensive appreciation of physeal plate, we recommend extended follow-up for those who present with signs of severe distal radius fracture, especially in case of associated ulnar fracture.
